Strange itQubes comment spam
A suspicious message from someone claiming to be “Thush Zuniga” at itQubes appears to be spam, using a fake Gmail address and generic wording that suggests it was part of an automated scam attempt.

By. Jacob
Edited: 2025-11-04 17:22
Hi beamtic.com, I'm Thush, we have ability to connect you with potential clients that are interested in your services, thought you might be a good fit. I'd love to talk about the details, when do you have time to talk?
Best regards,
Thursh
itQubes
This message was submitted by someone claiming to be Thush Zuniga, using the e-mail address qubesleads@gmail.com.
So, what’s wrong with that, you might ask? Quite a lot, actually:
- The message was submitted as a comment to an unrelated article, which strongly suggests it was part of an automated campaign.
- It’s a generic template that doesn’t reference anything specific, making it obvious that it’s spam.
- It mentions “my services” even though I don’t advertise any services on the Beamtic site. That alone shows a lack of understanding—or even basic effort—on the sender’s part.
- The use of an anonymous gmail address instead of an official company domain raises suspicion and makes it look like a fraud attempt rather than a legitimate business inquiry.
- There is indeed an “ITQUBES (PVT) LTD” company in Sri Lanka, which lists a certain “Thush” also known as “Thushyantha Thirugnanaselvam” on its about page. However, the company provides an official contact address, so any real outreach would come from that domain—not from a random Gmail account.
On the company’s website, only first names are listed, and the name used in this submission doesn’t match what even a quick Google search reveals about the business.
This looks like random spam — but even when a message appears legitimate, there can still be questionable motives behind it. HTML forms are notoriously vulnerable to spam and automated submissions.
It could even be a more malicious attempt to flood a company’s inbox by baiting website owners into replying to mass-submitted messages. For that reason, I’ve adopted a simple policy: I generally don’t respond to unsolicited form-submissions.
Before replying to any form-submitted message, it’s wise to verify that it was sent by a real person and not an automated script. Even better, take a moment to confirm that the information provided is genuine and consistent with public records. A quick background check can help prevent wasted time.
Instead, I quietly mark such messages as spam and move on.

Tell us what you think: